Tuesday, June 3, 2014

RIHANNA'S CFDA AWARDS DRESS, SLUT-SHAMING AND FEMINISM

SOURCE: BILLBOARD.COM
It’s been a day well spent. Thanks to Rihanna and her revealing CFDA Awards dress I’ve spent the morning on various people’s social media timelines debating things like “appropriate” and “sophisticated”. See, many felt that Rihanna’s choice of dress was “inappropriate”. They feel that she shouldn’t be parading her gorgeous body for all to see, because, as one lady on Facebook put it, it makes her look “cheap” and it makes her “uNondindwa”. For those of you who don’t know what the last word means, basically, this lady thinks Rihanna deserves to be called a whore!
She went on to say it wasn’t a celebration of her sexuality but that Rihanna was rather “spreading sexuality”, whatever this means. In my mind, I interpreted this to mean Rihanna’s choice of dress may attract the wrong kind of attention. That women who choose to dress up in a way that is less than what society says is “appropriate”- I think “covered up” would be the term- it makes them a target for rape.
I find this sort of view to be explicitly apologetic to the worst kind of treatment for women. Remember the mini-skirt Noord Taxi rank debacle where a young woman was ridiculed and told she deserved it because she was purposely seeking the attention of men by wearing what she was comfortable in?
I find it hard to reconcile the idea of other women being critical of what others choose to wear to the extent of calling them “sluts” with the idea of progressing feminism. I don’t see how this is any different to the treatment of women by men, which makes feminism necessary to begin with.
Now, its one thing to think of Rihanna’s dress as ugly or whatever it is you want to think of it, but how does it warrant her suddenly being labelled a slut?
This is little more than slut-shaming disguised as some sort of progressive view on how women should present themselves. Who gets to set the standard? The many centuries of norms entrenched by patriarchy? Women who see themselves as the guardians of what womanhood is? Whatever anyone may want to say, the one thing we should not allow as a society- I certainly can’t let it slide- is the labelling of other people according to a standard. Whose standard is it anyway? It breeds discrimination and opens the floodgates for ridicule, insults and the slut-shaming.
Being a young man, I know there are many women who have misgivings with me entering into a debate about feminism and womanhood. Who are you to be talking about this subject, I guess would be the question. You are not a woman! Well, let me just say that I may not be a woman but I have women in my life who are very dear to me and I can’t sit back and be seen as a proponent for allowing a situation where they may be subject to ridicule because of the choices they make. The question I have for the women who have made it their business to insult other women in this manner is: where does it stop? At what point do you draw the line to say men can’t call women whores, bitches, sluts while at the same time you engage in the kind of behavior that perpetrates this name calling? What makes you any different from those proponents of patriarchy?
Some would say by saying Rihanna should be allowed to wear whatever she wants one is condoning nudity. Far from it, but even if that was the case, is the human body so vile that it must be covered up and people must be made to feel shameful for their ideas of its beauty and what is flattering to them?
We can’t hold people responsible for the failures of those who lack respect and home training. If, as a man you find it impossible for you to appreciate Rihanna’s beauty without losing your twinges of conscience, how is that her fault? Be responsible for you own behaviour.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

She should leave something for the imagination. Now all the boys and girls have nothing to look forward to in enticing her to 'take it off now girl, take it off now girl, I wanna see your beauty'. Also, this is pure attention seeking behaviour and not conducive to her place as a role model to young girls and women.

Nkhensani said...

I am so impressed with Anna Wintour's decision to give Rihanna the fashion icon award. In recent years, Rihanna has definitely been working hard on her image, and it has paid off. Her collaborations with MAC and River Island are evidence that she has something valuable to contribute to the fashion world- and the sales of the products prove that the masses are following her cues.

People who say they are tired of seeing her naked body, or that she is not being a good role model are projecting their own issues onto her. (Unfortunately, this has always happened in society: the world's social anxieties are projected onto women's bodies)

No one can tell her how to express herself in her body, and to try and impose standards of propriety onto someone is actually quite a futile exercise. The problem the people are having is that they feel "assaulted" when they see images of her owning her body and not hiding it the way conventions would require her to.

Calling Rihanna a whore will not make you any more comfortable with your body, or make her any less successful. Calling her a "bad role model" is a feeble excuse for not putting effort into raising your children. She is not "modelling" anything- it is up to parents to teach their children how to interpret what they see in the media.

Earthseeds said...

Bull!

If a woman in her 60s or 70s were to wear the same dress everyone, including you would be horrified, turned off and/or nauseated. I'm tired of people claiming that being sexy is equivalent to borderline or full on sluttiness. In 15 years when Rihanna has daughters herself we'll see how much "free expression of her body" she'll want her daughter(s) to put on display for all the world.

Also the writer of the article compared this dress Rihanna is wearing to the first public appearance of the mini skirt. The mini shirt from the 50s/60s still covered the wearers butt/privates.

Yes there are women in Afrika (and other non-western cultures) throughout history and now who go about their day either bare chested or totally nude and no one bats an eye or thinks it's inappropriate (except to the outsider/onlooker). Those Afrikan cultural and societal traditions are not the same as what Rihanna (and other current entertainers) are doing.


She is setting a bad example for young girls (especially Black girls) that it's "normal" to display your body for all the world to see to find you interesting, beautiful, talented, of value and desirable. The last time I checked that's the same thought process of whores, strippers and, well 21st century music industry performers.


We won't go into all the negative influences and expectations this will add to what boys and young men are developing about/for girls and women.


No one is even talking about the thousands of Swarovski crystals the "dress" was made from or the 100s of hours it took to create. Her nudity trumped the artistry and craftsmanship of the dress.

Rihanna isn't that deep and more than likely doesn't know the historical and cultural facts about any indigenous Afrikan cultures where nudity is normal. She's not attempting to channel any Queens or Deities from Ancient Kemet or Keneset, Dogon or Fon priestesses... Rihanna is another Black female puppet that's no different than an enslaved Black women on the plantation. She's obeying, acting, believing and behaving exactly what a good house negro should.

Everyone applauding Rihanna for the very youthful bad decision this dress is, I bet the majority of you wouldn't (and couldn't) wear that same dress in public. Or would want your daughters to...

The moment your man didn't stop staring at a woman in this dress or tried to mac on her you'd be up side his had and calling her all kinds of names.

It's funny how the morality bar especially in America is diving lower and lower.

All you size 8s and up better hit the gym and lay off the fried/fatty foods so you can squeeze butt naked into this "Rihanna dress" to keep up and put your money makers where your mouths are because this will be the norm in a couple of years.

It's amazing, a mother can't breast feed in public but Rihanna can be nude in public without being fined for indecency to receive a fashion industry award endorsed by a magazine that rarely features Black models or non-actors in articles.

Janelle Monae is prettier, more talented, intelligent, sensual and Black conscious than Rihanna will ever be yet we don't see her in a $100,000 see through dress.

There's a huge difference between natural sensuality in a woman and forced attempts and claims of sexiness. The difference being that sensuality just is and sexy is an conscious effort, most over due.

This is over done.